Posts Tagged ‘train’

Nation’s busiest railroad struggles with old wires

Monday, August 22nd, 2011

By John Christoffersen
Associated Press

As published in the Sunday edition of the Record Journal on August 21, 2011

NEW HAVEN — After passengers became stuck in a disabled train with no air conditioning in stifling heat last month on the nation’s busiest rail line, Metro-North Railroad pointed to a familiar culprit hanging around for a century.

Metro-North said the severe troubles on July 22 that led desperate passengers to call 911, remove emergency windows and even flee the train to walk along the railroad were caused by overhead wires that power the trains. Portions of the catenary system date to 1914 and are prone to failure in extreme heat when wires sag and become tangled in mechanical arms on top of the train cars.

Metro-North promised this week to work with the Connecticut Department of Transportation to replace the wires and other aging infrastructure “as expeditiously as possible.” Connecticut began replacing the wires in 1996 and the project is about 60 percent done but is not expected to be finished until 2015. “This system is decades past its useful life and the fragile condition of the system leads to regular failures, significantly impacting service reliability,” the railroad wrote in a report of an investigation into last month’s troubles.

The overhead wires are responsible for about 8 percent of delays on the New Haven line, Metro-North said. With nearly 400 trains operating on the line daily and Metro-North carrying 37 million people annually, train officials said it’s challenging to make improvements.

New York has already replaced its catenary system and has not experienced failures, according to the report. Metro-North noted that new train cars are arriving in Connecticut and promised to improve its emergency response when trains are disabled.

“It is important to note, however, that these actions cannot overcome years of disinvestment in infrastructure and equipment,” the report stated.

Gene Colonese, railroad administrator for DOT, said the original goal was to finish the project by 2010 but it proved more complicated. He said officials recently decided to focus more on upgrades to the wires rather than railroad bridges, but still doesn’t expect to finish the work before 2015.

The real issue was Metro-North’s emergency response and failure to communicate, said Jim Cameron, who heads up the rail commuter council. Downed wires are a common cause of major delays, but DOT projects are always delayed and even new wires can be pulled down by old train cars, he said.

A new fleet of train cars has been slowly arriving, but Cameron said it’s been delayed more than a year.

“These are all excuses Metro-North can use, none of which deal with the fundamental issues of their personnel and their incompetence and their lack of communication when something happens,” Cameron said. “Passengers were that desperate that they felt the call to 911 was going to be necessary to save their lives.”

Frank K. Darmstadt, a 47year-old New Jersey resident who was on the train to visit his parents, said passengers sat in the train for about 45 minutes in Westport with little communication by Metro-North. Passengers begged for water and began opening emergency windows for air, he said.

“People were on the verge of passing out,” Darmstadt said, noting there were pregnant and elderly passengers. “There was a sense of nobody knew what the heck was going on and nobody knew what to do in this emergency type of situation.”

Ron Kovis, a 53-year-old graphic artist from Fairfield who was on the train when it broke down in Westport, said it felt like the train was well over 100 degrees. He said passengers pleaded with train personnel to open the doors, an elderly man next to him was struggling and two women managed to get off the train and were walking alongside it. “It was very claustrophobic and extremely hot,” Kovis said. “I couldn’t believe how hot it was.”

Metro-North apologized and promised to make more frequent announcements and enact other reforms, including stepped up coordination with local first responders.

Cameron said his group has tried unsuccessfully for years to get Metro-North to improve its communications.

Kovis said he wasn’t surprised to hear Metro-North blame the catenary system.

“It seems like most of the time when we have problems it’s related to the overhead wires,” he said. “It seems like it’s taken forever.”

Kovis said commuters are also frustrated with the slow arrival of the new trains, adding “probably the richest area in the country and I think we probably have the worst train system in the country. There’s just something wrong with that.”

REMINDER – Information meeting set Aug. 4th regarding the New Haven-Hartford-Springfield commuter rail project

Thursday, August 4th, 2011

As published in the Record Journal Friday July 22, 2011

WALLINGFORD — The office of Mayor William W. Dickinson Jr. will sponsor a public information meeting at 6:30 p.m. Aug. 4 in the Town Council chambers at the Town Hall, 45 S. Main St.

Representatives from the Connecticut Department of Transportation and their consultant team will provide an update on the New Haven-Hartford-Springfield commuter rail project and its impact on Wallingford and possible station locations, including the property on South Cherry Street next to Judd Square Condominiums.

After the presentation, a question-and-answer session will be open to all attendees.

For information, call the mayor’s office at (203) 294-2070 or the engineering department at (203) 294-2035.

GOV. MALLOY ANNOUNCES $40 MILLION FOR HIGH SPEED RAIL FUNDS RELEASED TO CONNECTICUT

Friday, April 8th, 2011

GOV. MALLOY ANNOUNCES $40 MILLION FOR HIGH SPEED RAIL FUNDS RELEASED TO CONNECTICUT

(HARTFORD, CT) – Governor Dannel P. Malloy today announced that $40 million in previously allocated stimulus funding was released today to Connecticut. Governor Malloy spoke at length with U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood about this when they met last month. While the funding for high speed rail was previously allocated, if not actually released to Connecticut by April 8, the state would have lost the money altogether.

“There was a very clear deadline by which we needed to have these funds released, and I wasn’t about to let $40 million in money for our state go somewhere else,” said Governor Malloy. “When I spoke with Secretary LaHood, I made our state’s case clearly and asked for his help cutting through the red tape to make sure that we got this money released to Connecticut by the deadline. I’d like to thank Secretary LaHood for his help on this matter, and I look forward to working with him closely on high speed rail and other transportation issues of import to the state.”

“High-speed rail will open up a new world of economic opportunities for Connecticut,” said Secretary LaHood. “The Administration’s initial $40 million investment in upgrading the New Haven-Hartford-Springfield rail line will create jobs now and help ensure that in years to come, Connecticut residents will have access to world class high-speed rail service and economic opportunities throughout New England.”

The $40 million in previously allocated funds will be used to double-track ten miles of existing track between Newington and Meriden, which is necessary for the full New Haven-to-Springfield rail line to move forward.

###

For Immediate Release: April 8, 2011

Contact: David Bednarz

David.Bednarz@ct.gov

860-524-7315 (office)

860-770-9792 (cell)

Twitter: @GovMalloyOffice

Facebook: Office of Governor Dannel P. Malloy

GOV. MALLOY MEETS WITH METRO-NORTH PRESIDENT HOWARD PERMUT

Thursday, February 10th, 2011

(HARTFORD, CT) – Governor Dannel P. Malloy today met with Metro-North President Howard Permut to talk more about the disruption in service on Metro-North’s New Haven line, and what can be done going forward. Mr. Permut met with Governor Malloy in his office in Hartford earlier today.

“The fact that Metro-North’s New Haven line is the busiest in the United States offers little solace to the commuters who depend on its service every day,” said Governor Malloy. “The issues we’re experiencing there are illustrative of the problems our state is facing generally – for too long we’ve deferred our problems, and instead, we’ve covered them up with a band-aid until some later date. Well, the band-aid has worn off and there is no later date. The average age of the New Haven railcar fleet is 32 years, versus the average age of other lines’ fleets which is 6 years – it’s no wonder the New Haven line is having trouble keeping up. And I’m very mindful of the concerns of the commuters who use the Waterbury line, who’ve gotten the short end of the stick over the years.  I’m determined to address their legitimate concerns as quickly as time and resources allow.

“Mr. Permut and I had a broad discussion about a capital investment program to get new cars on line as soon as possible. The final stage of testing for the current M8 cars is scheduled to begin shortly, and my bond commission agenda includes funding for the final 38 cars. I’m not pretending this will solve all of our problems – it won’t. But I don’t have the luxury – nor do I have the inclination – to wait around and let someone else deal with this. I asked Mr. Permut for regular updates on the cars currently being repaired, as well as the reduced winter schedule.

“There is no silver bullet, but I am committed to getting the New Haven line back to where it needs to be to serve the people of Connecticut.”

For Immediate Release:

Colleen Flanagan

Director of Communications

860.524.7308 (o)

860.770.8090 (c)

Colleen.Flanagan@ct.gov

Short follow up to my last post regarding – “Metro North Sucks”

Saturday, February 5th, 2011

I sent in a complain by email; here is part of the canned response:

“You will receive a response as soon as possible; however, some responses can take up to 15 business days.”

There are but a few things on the planet that actually take 15 days or longer to occur.

There are a few exceptions of course.

Responding to a customer complaint does not fall in to that category.

My personal follow up to – “Metro North Sucks”

Saturday, February 5th, 2011

So I calmed down a bit since my ride home Friday but I am no happier about the circumstances.

I hate to lose another night of seeing my little ones at the end of the day but I may have to on the 16th to attend the Connecticut Rail Commuter Council Commuter Summit planned for that Wednesday night.

In the event I decide against going, I wrote the following and emailed it to Metro North for whatever it’s worth:

I used to be a big fan of the railroad and Metro North but the delays and cancellations I have been experiencing are inexcusable. I was stuck on the train AGAIN (the 4:34 on Friday evening). Other trains go screaming by and I was stuck on a disabled train. If it isn’t the weather, it’s a switch problem. If it’s not a switch problem, it’s an electrical one. This day I was on a diesel engine that apparently had overheating issues. Plain and simple, if it isn’t one thing it is another but there isn’t a week that has gone by without some sort of issue and I am overlooking all the weather related problems.

The engineers on my Friday train finally got the train started but they forced everyone off the train at Stamford to switch trains; one that was short a car. Add the riders waiting to board at Stamford plus all of us and it was standing room only.

If Metro North and the MTA had to refund customers for all of these inconveniences, delays and so forth they’d be broke by the end of the shortest month of the year.

There is no reason for these types of delays on a day like Friday where there are no weather issues.

Because I didn’t want to assume the risk of being stuck in New York City without a way home, which is a direct result of the lousy service given on the Metro North line, I have lost one day of work each week for the past six weeks.

For all this, I pay $385.00 a month for the privilege to ride this decrepit fleet. Unfortunately, it is still more economical than trying to drive into the city and park each day.

I would pay twice that amount if it came with an on time guarantee on the condition of, if they were late (more than five minutes) due to non-acts of God issues, I would be reimbursed 10% of my ticket cost for each event.

The MTA and Metro North would never have the stones to implement a program like that because it would be paying out to the ridership constantly.

The worst part of this is getting home late. When the train is on time I get home by 6:45PM. I get to spend 30 minutes with my two year old and my three year old before they go to bed. Then I spend an addition hour or so with my five and six year old.

When the train is delayed more than 30 minutes I miss that time with my littlest ones and I am often resigned to just peaking into their room and seeing them sleep.

No one should have to resign themselves to a tiny consolation like that when it should be the rule to be home on time and not the exception.

Metro North Sucks

Friday, February 4th, 2011
I used to be a big fan of the railroad and Metro North but these delays are inexcusable; stuck on the train AGAIN for no apparent reason (the 4:34 on Friday evening). Other trains go screaming by and we sit here. If it isn’t the weather, it’s a switch problem. If it’s not a switch problem, it’s an electrical one. I’m on a diesel engine today – what’s the problem? No fuel?
Where’s Thomas the Tank Engine when you need a Really Useful Engine?

Now they’ve finally gotten the train started but they are going to force everyone off the train at Stamford to switch trains and I am sure that train won’t be over crowded at all.

If Metro North and the MTA had to refund customers for all of these inconveniences, delays and so forth they’d be broke by the end of the shortest month of the year.

There is no reason for this at all on a day like today where there are no weather issues.

GOV. MALLOY CALLS METRO-NORTH PRESIDENT REGARDING SERVICE REDUCTION

Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011

GOV. MALLOY CALLS METRO-NORTH PRESIDENT TO HELP FIND IMMEDIATE SOLUTION  TO SERVICE REDUCTION ON NEW HAVEN LINE

(HARTFORD, CT) – Earlier this afternoon, Governor Dannel P. Malloy called Metro-North Railroad President Howard Permut, directly intervening to help find an immediate solution to a problem with which  New Haven line commuters have been dealing. Due to the severity and intensity of the storms which have affected both Connecticut and New York this winter, as well as the aged and antiquated equipment and service facilities on the line, Permut has announced a reduction in the number of trains and shift times on the New Haven line. Governor Malloy was joined on the call by Lieutenant Governor Nancy Wyman and state Department of Transportation Commissioner Jeffrey Parker.

“Hailing from Fairfield County, I know all too well what a reduction in service or reliability on the New Haven line means for commuters in the area,” said Governor Malloy. “That’s why I felt it was important to call Howard to ask about any and all alternative options for commuters. Let me be clear: This isn’t about placing blame. We’ve had a record-breaking winter in terms of our weather, and our railcars and service facilities have not been kept up in the manner they should have been. We all know this is true. So in addition to my long-term focus on improving Metro-North’s reliability and functionality, I’m also focused on this short-term service reduction and ways in which we can help commuters get into and out of New York City more easily.”

Permut told Governor Malloy that Metro-North is operating under an expedited repair schedule, with crews working around the clock to put cars back in service as quickly as they can. Permut said that the lack of shop space has been an impediment to their success. In addition to funding for the M8 rail cars, Governor Malloy has also put funding for the New Haven rail yard  on his Bond Commission Agenda. That agenda is expected to be voted on later this month.

###

Colleen Flanagan

Director of Communications
Governor Dannel P. Malloy
860-524-7308 (office)
860-770-8090 (cell)
Colleen.Flanagan@ct.gov

EDITORIAL – Transport and rails

Tuesday, October 26th, 2010

As published in the Record Journal Tuesday October 26, 2010

One fine quality about New England is that its beauty is on a small scale.

This means that, for example, one can leave an urban area in Connecticut – say downtown Meriden – and in 5 minutes up the Chamberlain Highway you are passing through farmland. In 20 you can be in Hartford or New Haven, and in 40 you can be in places like East Haddam, Litchfield, Ashford or Oxford.

Our highly efficient highway system makes this convenient.

But we also have a network of rails which could make all this even easier. Improving existing rail lines so all have two sets of tracks, thus removing ridiculous limits on rail traffic, springs to mind. That would certainly aid tourism. But think also of economic development. Our towns and cities are very close together. Hartford and New Haven are only 40 miles apart, center to center. Middletown is 10 miles east of that axis, Waterbury 12 miles west, with Meriden in their midst.

Much of our region of the nation is similarly arranged. Yes, towns and cities originally followed contours of river valleys, but even rivers are all small scale. In northern New England, this pattern repeats, though with a bit more space.

What makes all this important just now is that Washington is preparing to spend $8 billion on high-speed train connections. It makes lots of sense in terms of energy and communications to be able to ship goods from place to place easily via rail and for commuting. Having an ability to sit in a rail car and eat breakfast, read a newspaper, complete work for the day to come, is a tremendous improvement on sitting in a personal car alone in one of those linear parking lots which develop during rush hour.

It’s kind of exciting, too, that Washington does not have some sort of speed requirement. Goals, in our vast open spaces, are for trains which can go 220 miles per hour (planned for the bullet train from LA to San Francisco), but these are not applied to New England. After all, if you’re only going 90 miles total, this extra speed isn’t going to change travel time much – but the convenience of traveling from center to center without negotiating ramps and feeder roads and local traffic will more than compensate.

The first step in this direction appears to be already marked out as the New Haven to Springfield line. With new stations, new complete tracks and new rolling stock, this line could be a model for the rest of the region. It sounds like a plan to us.

MY TAKE – State gets $120m for rail project

Tuesday, October 26th, 2010

imageSpeaking as the person who racked up 110,000 miles on his car over the past six years – much of it attributed to traveling to and from customer locations around New England – I wholeheartedly think this is a great investment in Connecticut.

To begin with, I would have taken the train more often when I worked for Microsoft if I could have. Over the course of my career there I had customers in Connecticut – Trumbull, Berlin, Groton and Bristol – nowhere close to the rail lines for the most part. In Rhode Island I had them in Providence; the trains on that segment of the rail lines were not conducive to commuter traffic. The customers I had in Massachusetts and New Hampshire were the same too – way too far off the rail lines to make it economically feasible. At the same time it wasn’t conducive to the amount of hours in the workday either.

I am writing this blog post from Metro North. Using my phone as a 3G hotspot, I am posting this online on my way to my present employer Bloomberg in Manhattan. 

To perhaps suggest that people from the Wallingford area wouldn’t use the commuter rail line into New York City is inaccurate. There’s a co-worker of mine on the 5:40 that drives from Southington to New Haven to catch the train. There are many others getting on at Union Station in New Haven; I haven’t surveyed where everyone is from but I am sure they are not all from New Haven.

I can do work while I am riding in. I can read the newspaper. I can chat with people (on the ride home – it’s more or less understood in the AM that you’re going to not be carrying on a lot of conversation for the most part.)

Most likely, I’ll finish this post and the online copy of the RJ and nap from Stamford to Grand Central.

The time on the train is mine and I blow by traffic sitting at a standstill on I-95.

The cost for my monthly rail pass is $385.00 and it costs me $85.00 for the monthly parking pass at the Temple Street Garage (Union Station has about a two year waiting list).

When you divide that into 22 workdays you’re talking about a daily expense of about $22.00.

You can’t even park in the city for less than twice that amount.

There is going to be way less wear and tear on my car once this all comes to pass on the New Haven / Springfield corridor.

I’ll be walking the two miles to the station from my house.

The only way this could get any better would be if I could take a deduction on my taxes.

I realize the real cost of the train fare is subsidized. If I had to pay twice as much I wouldn’t necessarily like it but I would still do it as it is more economical than the alternative.

If we need to subsidize anything then the American worker is something I am going to pick every time.

There are uses for the train beyond commuting to work.

If there is a spur into Bradley International Airport just think of the ease of having someone drop you off at the Station in Wallingford or Meriden or where ever it is close for you and stepping off the train about an hour later at Bradley. No long drive there, no parking fees, no worries if your plane is late getting in as the trains will probably run every hour or so.

I could probably justify going down to one car in my household – four kids and all. The savings on insurance, taxes and upkeep would pay for any personal additional costs of taking the train from Wallingford to New Haven if I were to go that route.

For those that say the New Haven / Springfield line wouldn’t carry the ridership to justify the costs I say look at the success of Shoreline East from Old Saybrook to New Haven before you pass judgment.

How many cars are not on the road along those points due to that commuting option? How much in emissions is removed on a yearly basis? How much in total over the years?

I believe all the pluses outweigh the minuses.

The best part is you still have freedom of choice. You can always still take your car if you really need or really want to.