Posts Tagged ‘Mayor’

ELECTION DAY Locations to vote in Wallingford

Tuesday, November 8th, 2011

District 1: Pond Hill School gym, 297 Pond Hill Road.
District 2: Stevens School gym, 18 Kondracki Lane.
District 3: Moses Y. Beach School gym, 340 N. Main St.
District 4: Dag Middle School gym, 106 Pond Hill Road.
District 5: Cook Hill School gym, 57 Hall Road.
District 6: Parker Farms School cafeteria, 30 Parker Farms Road.
District 7: Yalesville School cafeteria, 415 Church St. (Route 68).
District 8: Senior Center, 38 Washington St.
District 9: Rock Hill School cafeteria, 911 Durham Road.

If you need additional information:

Registrar of Voters

45 South Main Street, Room #211
(203) 294-2125

Registrars:
Samuel Carmody
Chester Miller

http://www.town.wallingford.ct.us/Content/Registrar_of_Voters.asp

Tomorrow, Tuesday November 8, 2011 is Election Day

Monday, November 7th, 2011

It’s not often that you get your chance to have your say, really have the opportunity to voice your mind and thoughts.

You do get an optimum chance on Election Day more so than any other time of the year.

There is no body of government that can affect you as much and that you have as much effect on as your municipal government.

Your municipal leaders regulate your ordinances, set the local budget for the town and the schools, as well as maintain and manage the tax base of the town.

If you voted in the federal election in 2008 you were one voice in 169 million registered. (About 133 million showed up to cast a vote).

86 million democrat – 55 million republican – 28 million others registered.

Of those voters there were 132,645,504 total voters out of an eligible voting age population of 212,702,354, which gives you a 62.4% participation rate.

For the elections held at the state level here in Connecticut as of 2010 the total number of registered voters is a hair over 2 million.

The largest group of registered voters in Connecticut is unaffiliated, accounting for 831,962 voters. There are 743,580 registered Democrats and 413,854 registered Republicans.

So when 73 percent of the state voters turnout, your voice is one in 1.46 million.

You as the voter in Wallingford during a municipal election are one of about 25,000 registered. During our last municipal election only 35.6 percent of the registered voters turned out.

Your voice there is one of about 8,900.

Where do you think your voice is the loudest?

Where do you think your voice is best heard among all the noise?

Wallingford is your town – get informed, get involved and VOTE on Tuesday November 8th

FROM WALLINGFORD – Budget time: get the details!

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

As published in the Record Journal on Sunday March 14, 2010

JASON ZANDRI

100_6948_

Budget season is effectively upon us; don’t let the fact that the recent Town Council meeting ran a record short 10 minutes or so — there’s plenty to discuss in the upcoming weeks.

Traditionally, budget sessions are not recorded and televised. Historically, these meetings have been held on separate dates from the normal Town Council meetings and the Wallingford Government Television staff has not been tapped to work.

It is possible that the budget sessions will be recorded and televised; we do have the new camera setup that allows the sessions to be recorded with fewer personnel. This cuts down on one of the chief arguments for not televising them in the past which was the de­sire to not overwork / over leverage the GTV staff.

The most logical answer to this would be to incorporate the budget meetings on regu­lar council nights as they did the past couple of years.

It doesn’t make sense to have compara­tively short council meetings (the past two were less than two hours combined total time) and then have all nine councilors and the mayor show up on additional evenings to discuss the budget separately when this all could be accomplished on the regular evenings.

We will have to see what decisions are made.

In consideration of what’s at stake this year — the grand list shrinking, property revalua­tion, and the school board looking for an in­crease in their budget in the four percent range— it’s probably more important than ever for people to get tuned in and involved.

One way to do this is to get to the budget meetings. This is not always possible for many of us, myself included these days.

If you can’t make the meetings then you should try to find other ways to get the de­tails.

I do not know if the budget details are go­ing to be made available ahead of time on the town website but I’ll make it a point to get them and scan them and get them online my­self if necessary.

The meetings themselves are televised on GTV on cable. I believe they are now on U­verse as well. If you are a satellite owner or if you miss the scheduled showings I do pro­vide the meetings online for streaming at http://wallingford.blip.tv/ Dave Moran and the Record Journal report right from the council chambers.

You can also go to the Wallingford Town website and get the minutes of the meetings; they are generally available a week or so after the meetings.

You can get in touch with any of the coun­cilors and ask them for any of the details you might have questions or concerns about. You should consider doing this now, ahead of the budget meetings themselves.

If I can instill in anyone just one thing I would hope that it would be that your voice does matter and it does make a difference. Make sure you’re heard.

It’s easy to not say anything and then later say “see — I’m glad I didn’t waste my time and energy, no one voted the way I thought anyway.” If you don’t offer your comments then the councilors have no way of knowing which way to go other than following their own thoughts on the matter.

They may still do that if they feel passion­ate about something or if your thoughts and opinions about items are in the minority of what towns people are communicating.

You change that by getting together people with similar opinions and becoming a driv­ing force for change. This cannot be a one ­item topic like this particular budget or one particular line item in the budget. It has to be a sustained and organized continual effort.

Else, you and others like you become mar­ginalized as another fly by night group of dis­senters that are to be dismissed out of hand.
Get informed, get involved and stay en­gaged.

People like that cannot be ignored.

More of the same with town unions as talks continue

Friday, February 12th, 2010

By Dave Moran
Record-Journal staff
dmoran@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2224

As published in the Record Journal Thursday February 11, 2010

Follow all the news directly on the Record Journal Website for the most up to date information. www.myrecordjournal.com

Write a letter to the editor letters@record-journal.com

WALLINGFORD — It ap­pears to be more of the same as the town attempts to negoti­ate labor contracts with three of its seven unions — the town contends there is “no money” to fund wage increases, while the unions continue to push for salary increases.

Two of those unions, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Em­ployees Local 1183, which rep­resents about 125 clerical, pub­lic works and sewer employees, and the Interna­tional Association of Firefight­ers Local 1326, which repre­sents about 60 firefighters, have entered into arbitration proceedings with the town. The third, the United Profes­sional and Service Employees Union Local 424-17, is still ne­gotiating with the town.

AFSCME has not had a con­tract since July 2008 and the firefighters union has not had a contract since July 2009. State labor laws prevent municipal employees from striking, and the unions have been working under the same salary and ben­efits packages since their con­tracts expired. Both unions have been in arbitration with the town for several months, and there is no time frame for when either might be resolved. Terence Sullivan, the town’s personnel director, said he could not comment on the sta­tus of negotiations, but he said the length that some of the town’s unions have been with­out contracts is not abnormal.

“There is no normalcy when it comes to collective bargain­ing,” Sullivan said. “It just de­pends on the issues. Once it hits arbitration it kind of stalls.”

Last year, before either went into arbitration, both AFSCME and the firefighters’ union pre­sented the town with contract proposals that included sev­eral furlough days to pay for salary increases, but the town rejected the proposals.

Mayor William W. Dickin­son Jr.’s budget for 2009-10 did not include raises for any town employees and he said agree­ing to the unions’ demands would set a bad precedent for future negotiations.

The four unions under con­tract with the town did receive their contracted wage in­creases last fiscal year, at a cost of $316,000, but the town paid for it by not filling vacan­cies in several departments and reducing the amount of work given to outside contrac­tors.

“We’ve gone to arbitration before,” said James De Bridgita, president of the local firefight­ers union. “We’ve gone — probably the longest I can re­member is two and a half years — without a contract. The guys would like to have a con­tract, would like to have a raise, but it seems to be part of the system in Wallingford.”

Larry Dorman, an AFSCME spokesman, echoed many of De Bridgita’s remarks, but said that what has been emerging during his union’s arbitration process with the town is that Wallingford, with its large sur­plus accounts, is in much bet­ter financial shape than many comparable municipalities in Connecticut.

“What distinguishes Wallingford from other negoti­ations is the fact that the town is in better shape than other cities,” Dorman said. “That’s something that’s become more apparent during the arbitra­tion process.”

But Dickinson, a Republican who has held office since 1984, has been reluctant to dip into the town’s reserve fund in the past and seemed to reiterate that stance Wednesday.

“The issue we’re dealing with this current year is the same as last year,” he said. “We’re saying no wage in­creases and trying to cut back — there’s just no agreement.”

MY TAKE on testimonial dinner for Mayor Dickinson; next week’s FROM WALLINGFORD

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

So I have posted the article from the Record Journal written by Dave Moran; the post is Statute a sticking point for Dickinson dinner

I have a POLL question up this week regarding the same here on the blog. Please consider weighing in.

Additionally, I have the actual statue – Sec. 9-609. (Formerly Sec. 9-333k). Party committees; designation as campaign treasurer. Limitation on multiple committees. Fund-raising events and testimonial affairs – posted from http://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/pub/chap155.htm#Sec9-609.htm on the blog as well at Supporters of Mayor Dickinson are having a testimonial for him – is this in violation of Connecticut General Statutes?

I am planning to do my next FROM WALLINGFORD article on this topic as well.

Somewhere between the desire for the supporters to have a celebratory event for the Mayor, the statute itself and its interpretation, what is legally binding (or not), and political bravado, there are three simple sayings that keep going through my head:

 

“The road to hell is paved with good intentions”

“No one is above the law”

“No good deed goes unpunished”

 

Be sure to check out FROM WALLINGFORD next Sunday.