MP3 AUDIO – Wallingford Town Council Meeting – November 24, 2009 is now online at Wallingford Politico
MP3 AUDIO – Wallingford Town Council Meeting – November 24, 2009 is now online at Wallingford Politico
Police Station Feasibility Study November 2009 can be downloaded via the post now online @ Wallingford Politico
As published in the Record Journal Thursday November 26, 2009
By Dave Moran
Record-Journal staff
dmoran@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2224
Follow all the news directly on the Record Journal Website for the most up to date information. www.myrecordjournal.com
Write a letter to the editor letters@record-journal.com
WALLINGFORD — A new police station on the Wooding-Caplan property could include 45 public parking spaces but would cost $20.25 million to $23.69 million, depending on how soon construction starts, plus at least another $8 million over the life of a 20-year bond.
Officials including town councilors and Mayor William W. Dickinson Jr. are left to weigh this information after an architect recommended against trying to expand the 135 N. Main St. police headquarters.
The report, by Brian Humes of Jacunski Humes Architects in Berlin, said there is enough space for a new facility at the adjacent Wooding-Caplan parcel, which is behind the storefronts on the northeast corner of Center and North Main streets.
The 3.5-acre property has been mostly vacant since the town acquired it for $1.5 million in 1992. Officials must decide whether to place a 47,000-square-foot building there or move the Police Department out of the central business district, as towns such as Southington have done.
Dickinson, a Republican who has held office since 1984, called the new station a high priority, but he wouldn’t say whether he favors a downtown site or a more rural location. Dickinson also said construction isn’t likely to start in the next year.
“I do think there is a comfort in what you know of as the existing condition, and that is having the Police Department right there,” he said. “I think they’ll probably be a variety of occasions for reviewing this issue, but I don’t see us implementing an actual project in 2010.”
The Town Council appeared to lack consensus after discussing the matter Tuesday. Concerns included the location and the cost. A new council will be seated Jan. 4.
Humes told the council a new station on the Wooding-Caplan property would provide 150 parking spaces, about 45 of which would be available for public parking.
He also addressed options for the current headquarters, which could be demolished or sold to a developer. Although the property is in a downtown historic district that is on the National Register of Historic Places, there are no restrictions on the building, he said.
The town would likely bond a project of that size over 20 years, said Comptroller James Bowes. Bowes estimated that finance charges could add an estimated $8 million to the final price tag over the life of the bonds, and that the first year’s repayment costs alone would be about $1.8 million, the equivalent of a half a mill in taxes. The station’s cost is estimated to increase the longer the town waits because of inflation and rising material costs.
A mill represents $1 in taxes for each assessed $ 1,000 of property value. Wallingford’s tax rate is 23.20 mills.
Southington faced a similar situation about a decade ago when it relocated its police station from Main Street to Lazy Lane, a less developed section of town. The town purchased a 7.4-acre parcel there for about $132,000 in 1998, then built a 27,000-square-foot building on the site for around $6 million. Town Manager John Weichsel said it proved more cost-effective to build on Lazy Lane and the town determined it did not need a police facility in the downtown area.
“The location of a police department is of no consequence. It can be in any part of the town,” Weichsel said Wednesday. “The exact location is not important. It’s an administrative and communication center. The site where (the old station) used to be was a terrible site, it had terrible soils … There’s no reason to be in the center, and with (the Lazy Lane) property, we did acquire it at what we felt to be a reasonable price.”
Wallingford’s department has occupied its station, a former state armory that dates to the 1920s, since 1986. Police Chief Douglas Dortenzio has said that it’s nearing the end of its life and can no longer accommodate police operations.
Dortenzio said the facility lacks a number of departmental necessities, including adequate room for property and evidence storage, up to date video monitoring and forensic equipment, space for a women’s locker room and separate holding facilities for juveniles. In January, a change in state law will no longer allow the department to house juveniles in adult holding cells.
“I don’t think it’s a question of how bad. I think it has to do more with the fact that here are services that I think people come to rely on … that we don’t provide,” Dortenzio said. “I don’t have the ability to provide them in this structure.”
Dortenzio, who has been chief for 19 years, acknowledged the steep price of a new station, but said a functioning police department is a question of a community’s “value systems.”
“From my perspective, setting municipal budgets has more to do with what a community’s goals are for the future and what their value systems are,” Dortenzio said. “If you think that the quality of life in town is in many ways preserved by law enforcement services in the community, then we need to start preparing for this.”
The regular meeting of the Wallingford Town Council from November 10, 2009 is now online and available in MP3 audio format.
You can now download the MP3 files and listen to the council meeting in your car on the way to work or while going for a walk or whenever you have the free time to listen in.
There is no need to be a slave to the schedule of the actual meetings every 2nd and 4th Tuesday or the broadcast schedule on Government Access TV (if you get it), nor do you need to sit in front of the computer and stare at the screen for 3+ hours Click the links and let the file download and SAVE AS to put it on any MP3 device.
If you decide to open it directly and begin streaming (or if your audio player does this by default) it may need to wait for one to two minutes for the download to reach a point where it will begin to play on its own.
It’s your town – get informed and get involved.
Wallingford Town Council from November 10, 2009
The regular meeting of the Wallingford Town Council from October 27, 2009 is now online and available in MP3 audio format.
You can now download the MP3 files and listen to the council meeting in your car on the way to work or while going for a walk or whenever you have the free time to listen in.
There is no need to be a slave to the schedule of the actual meetings every 2nd and 4th Tuesday or the broadcast schedule on Government Access TV (if you get it), nor do you need to sit in front of the computer and stare at the screen for 3+ hours Click the links and let the file download and SAVE AS to put it on any MP3 device.
It’s your town – get informed and get involved.
The regular meeting of the Wallingford Town Council from October 13, 2009 is now online and available in MP3 audio format.
You can now download the MP3 files and listen to the council meeting in your car on the way to work or while going for a walk or whenever you have the free time to listen in.
There is no need to be a slave to the schedule of the actual meetings every 2nd and 4th Tuesday or the broadcast schedule on Government Access TV (if you get it), nor do you need to sit in front of the computer and stare at the screen for 3+ hours Click the links and let the file download and SAVE AS to put it on any MP3 device.
It’s your town – get informed and get involved.
As supplied by the Record Journal
Winners are in green
| Mayor | |
| Dickinson (R) | 6366 |
Town Council
| Farrell (R) | 5640 |
| Parisi (R) | 5139 |
| Fishbein (R) | 4798 |
| Rascati (R) | 4685 |
| Testa (D) | 4684 |
| LeTourneau (R) | 4669 |
| Sullivan (D) | 4541 |
| Cervoni (R) | 4269 |
| Economopoulos (D) | 4024 |
| Laffin (R) | 3992 |
| DiNatale (D) | 3991 |
| Zandri (D) | 3982 |
| Harwood (D) | 3690 |
| Gross (D) | 3559 |
| Reynolds (D) | 3244 |
Board of Education
| McKay (R) | 4995 |
| Hennessey (R) | 4981 |
| Cei (D) | 4572 |
| Miller (R) | 4378 |
| Castelli (D) | 4357 |
| Votto (D) | 4343 |
| Marrone (R) | 4183 |
| Brooder (R) | 4178 |
| Ford (D) | 4111 |
| Pannone (D) | 3973 |
| Reynolds (D) | 3943 |
| Varney (R) | 3753 |
| Cornwall (R) | 3737 |
| Robinson (D) | 3182 |
| Wallingford Charter Revision | |
| QUESTION 1 | |
| Veto Override YES | 2581 |
| Veto Override NO | 5786 |
| QUESTION 2 | |
| Town Clerk YES | 2854 |
| Town Clerk NO | 5359 |
| QUESTION 3 | |
| Bd. Ethics YES | 3227 |
| Bd. Ethics NO | 4819 |
| QUESTION 4 | |
| Bd. Educ. YES | 2472 |
| Bd. Educ. NO | 5778 |
| QUESTION 5 | |
| Council/PUC YES | 2521 |
| Council/PUC NO | 5617 |
| QUESTION 6 | |
| Ref. 15% YES | 2120 |
| Ref. 15% NO | 5970 |
| QUESTION 7 | |
| Misc. Admin YES | 2751 |
| Misc. Admin NO | 5294 |
Democracy at its best— all you need to do is show up.
District 1: Pond Hill School, 297 Pond Hill Road
District 2: Stevens School, 18 Kondracki Lane
District 3: Moses Y. Beach School, 340 N. Main St.
District 4: Dag Hammarskjold Middle School, 106 Pond Hill Road
District 5: Cook Hill School, 57 Hall Road
District 6: Parker Farms School, 30 Parker Farms Road
District 7: Yalesville School, 415 Church St. (Route 68)
District 8: Wallingford Senior Center, 38 Washington St.
District 9: Rock Hill School, 911 Durham Road
As published in the Record Journal Sunday November 1, 2009
Editor: On July31st the Town Attorney provided the Council with an explanatory text explaining the proposed revisions to the Charter. If adopted by the council it would have been made available to the public for review.
At the August 11th Town Council meeting four Republican councilors voted no to making it available in an effort to prevent voters from understanding the questions.
A similar message ‘ just vote no’ is now being promoted by the PAC ‘Save Our Charter’ to which the mayor is a major contributor. Say ‘NO’ to their message and cast your vote on each individual question.
JAMES BROSNAN, WALLINGFORD
What would be happening now if the question concerning the Wallingford Town Council’s power to override a mayoral veto was not on the ballot?
The issue of charter revision would be a big yawn. There would be no PAC instructing folks to “Save our Charter.” Political operatives would not be telling voters to just vote “No.” It would be a duller election and Steve Knight wouldn’t be giving much of a hoot about this.
The anti-charter revision forces, however, anxious about preserving the Mayor’s power, have decided that the first ballot question should be the poison pill to kill all of charter revision. It’s easier to tell voters to vote “no” on everything, than to tell them: “Think about each question; learn about the complexities of Wallingford’s government ; read the explanatory text . . . bla bla bla.”
Woe is me. I am in the bla, bla, bla crowd.
Nine members of the Charter Revision Commission met September 2008 through June 2009 to discuss, debate, and, yes, compromise their differences in an honest effort to recommend to voters where the Town charter needed to be changed. They were not puppets on a string. Five Democrats and four Republicans, all strong and independent thinkers, worked together for the good of the Town.
After all was said and done, after all the issues were examined and debated, there was only one party-line vote that approved of a change that will end up on your ballot. This was a remarkable achievement that reflected non-partisan Democracy and Wallingford governance at its best.
Each question on your ballot reflects a favorable recommendation by the Charter Revision Commission.
Let’s see how the members voted:
Question One: Should the council be able to over-ride a mayoral veto by six votes instead of seven? 5-4 party-line vote.
Question Two: Should the Town Clerk be hired and supervised by the Mayor instead of appointed, every two years, by the Town Council? 7-0, unanimous vote.
Question Three (Part A) Should the Mayor appoint two members of the Board of Ethics; the council appoint two; and those four appoint a fifth? 5-3 bi-partisan plurality.
Question Three (Part B): Should the charter contain specific provisions (see explanatory text) intended to diminish the potential effect of political influences on Board of Ethics decisions? 8-0 unanimous vote.
Question Three (Part C) Should the Board of Ethics complaint procedures be strengthened? 6-3 bi-partisan vote. (2 Democrats and 4 Republicans voting in favor.)
Question Four: Should the term of Board of Education members be increased from two years to three? 7-1 vote.
Question Five: Should the Council be able to veto actions by the PUC by 6 votes instead of seven? 7-1 vote.
Question Six: Should the required the voter turnout needed at a special election on an ordinance, by initiative or referendum, be decreased from 20 percent to 15 percent? 7-1 vote.
Question Seven: This question includes all the other changes recommended by the Charter Revision Commission, most by unanimous vote.
The explanatory text prepared by the Town Attorney, available at the Town Clerk’s office or at www.town.wallingford.ct.us, describes just 9 of these changes. Five of the nine were approved by unanimous vote. Two changes were approved 7-1. One vote was 6-2. Another vote was 5-4, but it was not along party lines, as the four Republicans split evenly on that question.
Such a serious, non-partisan effort should not be cast aside as a sham.