Posts Tagged ‘candidate’

Focus on Connecticut, not Kabul

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

As Published Tuesday, December 8, 2009 

Journal Inquirer http://www.journalinquirer.com

Follow all the news directly on the Journal Inquirer Website for the most up to date information http://www.journalinquirer.com

Write a letter to the editor letters@journalinquirer.com

By Merrick Alpert – Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate

I recently walked across Connecticut — from Stonington to Greenwich along Route 1 — to express my opposition to the war in Afghanistan. Carrying a U.S. flag, I began on the Rhode Island border and trekked for five days until I reached New York.

Having served as a U.S. military peacekeeper in the Muslim nation of Bosnia, I know from firsthand experience about both the power and limits of military force.

As a Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate seat occupied by Christopher Dodd, I wanted to make clear my opposition to the war.
Eight years ago, following the 9/11 attacks, we appropriately used military force to overthrow Afghanistan’s Taliban regime, a regime that had hosted and aided al-Qaida’s 9/11 plotters.

Phase I was a textbook example of how to wage modern warfare using “hard power.” American forces consisted of less than 500 Special Operations members on the ground and overwhelming U.S. airpower. They worked collaboratively with 15,000 members of Afghanistan’s Northern Alliance. The indigenous ground component was crucial in ensuring the operation had an Afghan and — more importantly — Muslim face. And it limited American casualties.

Then, the Bush administration and congressional Republicans — aided by sycophantic Democrats and an enabling media — ignored a century’s worth of lessons in counterinsurgency warfare.

The opportunity to launch a successful Phase II “soft power” operation, where civil affairs forces and multinational peacekeepers were deployed to build a democratic Afghanistan, was squandered.

Instead, the Bush-Cheney faction commenced the Iraq fiasco. The focus was taken off Afghanistan. The Taliban gained strength. Pakistan became safe haven for terrorists. International support evaporated.

Now, the Obama administration is embarking on a similar ill-fated effort. The president, having recently authorized 20,000 additional troops, this week authorized some 30,000 more. The U.S. troop count will soon stand at more than 100,000, just as our allies are abandoning the field.

Against this backdrop I began my 117-mile walk across the state. As dawn broke on Nov. 10, I stood at the war memorial on the Rhode Island side of the bridge over the Pawcatuck River. I reflected on the facts that inspired my march. One thousand of our troops had already perished. Our real enemy — al-Qaida — numbered less than 100 in Afghanistan. We had become so desperate for a partner that we were propping up the ineffectual Karzai government that had just rigged an election at U.S. taxpayer expense. And, there was no end in sight.

Yet as I began the march across Connecticut, I became convinced that the essential problem with the Afghan war was not just military: It was also economic.

I slogged past hundreds of boarded-up businesses that would never open again. Many were so recently closed that the wood over the windows didn’t show any weathering. As I pushed west across the Thames and Connecticut rivers my talk of effective counterinsurgency fell silent to scenes of schools in disrepair. As I trudged through East Haven and crested the hill to look out over New Haven harbor, I saw poverty and despair. I saw a city where half the minority students never graduate from high school. Drawn west into the darkness, I walked over roads and bridges that were crumbling. And as I stopped to talk with people along the way they would repeatedly tell me that they were “forgotten.” Forgotten became the word I heard the most.

Those who have voted to support the war in Afghanistan, like Dodd, have gotten it backward. Why are we sacrificing Connecticut’s prosperity for a war the goal of which cannot be explained? Why are we forsaking the schoolteacher in Groton, the storeowner in East Haven, and the unemployed African-American in Bridgeport for a corrupt regime in Afghanistan?

I am more interested in rebuilding Connecticut than Kabul. My vision is for a Connecticut where we invest in job creation, educational opportunity, and health care. Those that have spent the last 40 years in Washington creating the problems we face today are incapable of solving them. It is time for career politicians with “seniority” to walk across the state and assess the carnage their war and misguided priorities have inflicted.

Career politicians, like Dodd, are too distant from our suffering to understand it.

And now it is time for them to take a hike.

The writer, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate, lives in Mystic with his wife and three children.

Wallingford Dems prepare to run with no mayoral hopeful – Geno Zandri attempting to petition on as 8th candidate for Town Council

Friday, July 24th, 2009

By Dave Moran
Record-Journal staff
dmoran@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2224

WALLINGFORD — The Republican and the Demo­cratic town committees have solidified their slates for the Nov. 3 election, but the impact of the absence of a mayoral candidate on the Democratic side probably won’t be deter­mined until ballots are cast.

Both parties nominated seven candidates each for both the Town Council and Board of Education, more than the maximum six seats any party is allowed to control.

Of note in the council race is that, while the Democrats hold a 5-4 edge on the council.,the Republicans will be running more incumbents because De­mocrats Michael Brodinsky and Michael Spiteri are not seeking re-election.

The Republican Town Com­mittee nominated incumbents Jerry Farrell Jr., Robert Parisi, Rosemary Rascati and John Le Tourneau Wednesday, as well as Vincent Cervoni, Craig Fishbein and Thomas Laffin.

The Democrats picked Vin­cent Testa, Nick Economopou­los and Vincenzo Di Natale, who are incumbents, and Robert Gross, John Sullivan, Don Harwood and Jesse Reynolds. Reynolds ran an un­successfully for the council in 2007.

“There’s obviously a benefit to incumbency, we all know that,” said Testa, the council’s current vice chairman who is serving his third consecutive term, “so there’s a little bit of an advantage in that respect, but at the same time we’re run­ning four very good newcom­ers this year.”

Testa said the incumbents plan to campaign on behalf of, and in some cases beside, the newcomers.

“As we campaign, we need to introduce the new candi­dates as well,” Testa said. “It has to be a team effort. What you have to demonstrate to the town is that as a group of can­didates you’re campaigning to­gether, and you have to be able to demonstrate that you’re go­ing to govern together as well.” Parisi, a Republican main­stay on the council since the early 1970s who is running for his 17th term, said this is one of the strongest Republican slates in recent memory.

“I’m very excited, quite frankly,” Parisi said Thursday. “We’ve got a good balance of both youth, experience and a sense of vigor this year. Every­body’s pumped and ready to run.”

Parisi and Testa said that gaining the majority on the council is crucial to both par­ties because it allows the victo­rious party to assert a degree of control over council pro­ceedings.

“It helps in the sense of pro­moting a philosophy, whatever that philosophy might be for the majority,” said Parisi, a for­mer majority leader.

But one area in which the two parties clearly differ this year is the mayoral race, in which, barring a third-party candidacy, Mayor William W. Dickinson Jr., a Republican who has held office since 1984, will be running for his 14th term unopposed.

The only other time Dickin­son did not face a Democratic challenger, in 2001, Republi­cans seized control of the Board of Education and the council. That year, 56 percent of all votes cast were for Re­publicans, compared to 44 per­cent for Democrats, and the GOP ended up with six mem­bers on both the school board and the council.

Testa said he does not fore­see a similar occurrence this year.

I don’t think that’s going to make a big difference,” he said of his party’s inability to field a mayoral candidate. “It’s nice to have someone on the top of the ticket, but unless it’s a very strong contender it’s not going to bring many votes to the un­derticket anyway. We still have to get out there and campaign.” Still, Dickinson said he is gearing up for his campaign, which he expects to begin in earnest in the fall.

“You have to communicate your thoughts and ideas re­gardless,” he said. “Sometimes it’s easier if there’s a contest, but I suspect there will be plenty of events with other candidates this year to express my views.”

The Democratic council slate could also grow by an ad­ditional candidate if Geno Zandri, a former five-term councilor and the party’s can­didate for mayor in 1999, suc­ceeds in his effort to petition his way onto the ballot.

Zandri needs to collect the signatures of 0.05 percent of all registered Democrats in town, or about 375.

“I just felt I wanted to peti­tion on,” he said Thursday. “It was the easiest for me.”

Vincent Avallone, chairman of the Democratic Town Com­mittee, said that if Zandri suc­ceeds he will be welcomed.

“If he does, he’ll be on the ticket with the other seven De­mocrats,” Avallone said. “And we’ll support all the candi­dates.”