Attacking Social Security

August 19th, 2010

By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: August 15, 2010

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/16/opinion/16krugman.html

A version of this op-ed appeared in print on August 16, 2010, on page A19 of the New York edition.

Social Security turned 75 last week. It should have been a joyous occasion, a time to celebrate a program that has brought dignity and decency to the lives of older Americans.

But the program is under attack, with some Democrats as well as nearly all Republicans joining the assault. Rumor has it that President Obama’s deficit commission may call for deep benefit cuts, in particular a sharp rise in the retirement age.

Social Security’s attackers claim that they’re concerned about the program’s financial future. But their math doesn’t add up, and their hostility isn’t really about dollars and cents. Instead, it’s about ideology and posturing. And underneath it all is ignorance of or indifference to the realities of life for many Americans.

About that math: Legally, Social Security has its own, dedicated funding, via the payroll tax (“FICA” on your pay statement). But it’s also part of the broader federal budget. This dual accounting means that there are two ways Social Security could face financial problems. First, that dedicated funding could prove inadequate, forcing the program either to cut benefits or to turn to Congress for aid. Second, Social Security costs could prove unsupportable for the federal budget as a whole.

But neither of these potential problems is a clear and present danger. Social Security has been running surpluses for the last quarter-century, banking those surpluses in a special account, the so-called trust fund. The program won’t have to turn to Congress for help or cut benefits until or unless the trust fund is exhausted, which the program’s actuaries don’t expect to happen until 2037 — and there’s a significant chance, according to their estimates, that that day will never come.

Meanwhile, an aging population will eventually (over the course of the next 20 years) cause the cost of paying Social Security benefits to rise from its current 4.8 percent of G.D.P. to about 6 percent of G.D.P. To give you some perspective, that’s a significantly smaller increase than the rise in defense spending since 2001, which Washington certainly didn’t consider a crisis, or even a reason to rethink some of the Bush tax cuts.

So where do claims of crisis come from? To a large extent they rely on bad-faith accounting. In particular, they rely on an exercise in three-card monte in which the surpluses Social Security has been running for a quarter-century don’t count — because hey, the program doesn’t have any independent existence; it’s just part of the general federal budget — while future Social Security deficits are unacceptable — because hey, the program has to stand on its own.

It would be easy to dismiss this bait-and-switch as obvious nonsense, except for one thing: many influential people — including Alan Simpson, co-chairman of the president’s deficit commission — are peddling this nonsense.

And having invented a crisis, what do Social Security’s attackers want to do? They don’t propose cutting benefits to current retirees; invariably the plan is, instead, to cut benefits many years in the future. So think about it this way: In order to avoid the possibility of future benefit cuts, we must cut future benefits. O.K.

What’s really going on here? Conservatives hate Social Security for ideological reasons: its success undermines their claim that government is always the problem, never the solution. But they receive crucial support from Washington insiders, for whom a declared willingness to cut Social Security has long served as a badge of fiscal seriousness, never mind the arithmetic.

And neither wing of the anti-Social-Security coalition seems to know or care about the hardship its favorite proposals would cause.

The currently fashionable idea of raising the retirement age even more than it will rise under existing law — it has already gone from 65 to 66, it’s scheduled to rise to 67, but now some are proposing that it go to 70 — is usually justified with assertions that life expectancy has risen, so people can easily work later into life. But that’s only true for affluent, white-collar workers — the people who need Social Security least.

I’m not just talking about the fact that it’s a lot easier to imagine working until you’re 70 if you have a comfortable office job than if you’re engaged in manual labor. America is becoming an increasingly unequal society — and the growing disparities extend to matters of life and death. Life expectancy at age 65 has risen a lot at the top of the income distribution, but much less for lower-income workers. And remember, the retirement age is already scheduled to rise under current law.

So let’s beat back this unnecessary, unfair and — let’s not mince words — cruel attack on working Americans. Big cuts in Social Security should not be on the table.

What high-speed rail means for us

August 18th, 2010

As published in the Record Journal Wednesday August 18, 2010

By Sean W. Moore

August 17, 2010 is a day that will go down in economic development history as the Governor’s Bond Commission approved a number of transportation related items and in particular Item Number 15.

The $260 million of funds will finance the costs associated with improvements necessary to implement commuter rail service on the 62 mile corridor between New Haven and Springfield, Massachusetts. In addition, this commitment demonstrates to the federal government that Connecticut has put up our fair share to compete on a multi-state project for the economic stimulus funds for High Speed and Inter-City Service.

Now that’s regionalism.

All of us in central Connecticut will be the beneficiaries of these actions. As a Transportation Strategy Board member, it is exciting for me to see our long range proposals get funded. As a chamber of commerce president, it is great to see additional affordable choices for workers and visitors to commute to fabulous sites in central Connecticut and beyond. As a resident, it’s great to see the opportunity for businesses to grow and to share the tax burden with the homeowners and personal property taxpayers.

The specific projected benefits are to reduce the number of vehicles on roads by approximately 4,000 cars each day and to generate close to 4,000 jobs. It is expected to save 1 billion gallons of fossil fuel annually and to reduce carbon emissions by over 10,000 tons a year.

This vision creates fabulous opportunities for transit-oriented development (TOD) within the half mile radius of improved rail stations along the line with parking and other necessary TOD amenities. Meriden will benefit from the Inter-City rail service as with Wallingford and Berlin benefiting from convenient commuter rail stops. We can connect our walking trails and local bus services with our downtowns and create livable and workable destinations in central Connecticut. We have a real opportunity here to create something.

I’d like to thank Governor Rell, Speaker Donovan and all of our legislative delegation for their long-range approach to economic development. Let’s get to work NOW! (For more details about the project, you can visit www.NHHSrail.com)

Sean W. Moore is the President of the Greater Meriden Chamber of Commerce .

His commentary is part of an occasional series entitled “ View from Colony Street. ”

China surges past Japan as No. 2 economy

August 17th, 2010

by JOE McDONALD of the Associated Press

BEIJING (AP) — China has eclipsed Japan as the world’s second-biggest economy after three decades of blistering growth that put overtaking the U.S. in reach within 10 years.

Japan is still far richer per person after confirming Monday that economic output fell behind its giant neighbor for the three months ending June 30. However, the news is more proof of China’s arrival as a force that is altering the global balance of commercial, political and military power.

Analysts are already looking ahead to when China might match the United States in total output — which the World Bank and others say could be no more than a decade away.
“This means the world will pay more attention to China, especially when most Western countries are mired in the bog of debt problems,” said economist Lu Zhengwei at Industrial Bank in Shanghai.

Unseating Japan — after earlier passing Germany, France and Britain — caps three decades of breakneck growth that has cemented a dramatic change in China’s place in the world over just the past five years.

State-owned Chinese companies have emerged as major resource investors, pouring billions of dollars into mines and oil fields from Latin America to Iraq. Chinese pressure helped to win a bigger voice for developing economies in the World Bank and other global institutions.

On a human level, China’s rise has allowed hundreds of millions of people to work their way out of poverty and sent a flood of students and tourists to the West. Its consumers are so avidly courted that companies from Detroit automakers to French handbag producers now design goods to suit them.

Still, China’s rise has produced glaring contradictions. The wealth gap between an elite who profited most from three decades of reform and its poor majority is so extreme that China has dozens of billionaires, while average income for the rest of its 1.3 billion people is among the world’s lowest. By contrast, Japan’s people still are among the world’s richest, with a per capita income of $37,800 last year, compared with China’s $3,600. So are Americans at $42,240, their economy still by far the world’s biggest.

According to Monday’s report, Japan’s nominal GDP was worth $1.286 trillion in the April-to-June quarter compared with $1.335 trillion for China. The figures are converted into dollars based on an average exchange rate for the quarter.

World stock markets mostly fell on the news that Japan’s economy grew just 0.1 percent in the second quarter, far short of expectations and well below the 1.2 percent growth in the first quarter. The report follows signs last week that both the U.S. and Chinese economies are not growing as fast as earlier in the year.

In the midst of the global crisis, stimulus-driven Chinese growth that hit 11.9 percent in the first quarter this year before easing in the latest quarter helped to propel the world out of recession. Chinese demand for raw materials and other imports buoyed economies from Australia to South Korea to Africa.

China uses more than half the world’s iron ore and more than 40 percent of its steel, aluminum and coal. It passed the United States last year as the biggest auto market and Germany as the biggest exporter.

"We are at the point now where China is overtaking the U.S. to be the engine of growth in consumption," said Amar Gill, a researcher for brokerage CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets.

China could match the U.S. in total output as early as 2020, said a World Bank forecast in June. America’s gross domestic product was $14.26 trillion last year, nearly three times China’s.

A more serious concern for communist leaders is China’s income per person, which the World Bank said ranked 124th in the world last year — more on a par with impoverished nations like Angola, Tunisia and El Salvador than Japan, which ranked 32nd, or the U.S., ranked 17th.

As a result, becoming the second-largest economy "isn’t something to add to national pride," said Zhang Bin, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, a government think tank.

"I care more about GDP per capita," Zhang said. "People in small countries like Switzerland lead a much wealthier life."

Despite slipping in the rankings, Japan still enjoys Swiss-style health, wealth and comfort. Tokyo has more Michelin-starred restaurants than Paris.

By contrast, China faces a huge and politically explosive gap between an elite who have profited from reform and a poor majority. The country has launched two manned space missions, but families in remote areas live in cave houses in hillsides.

"China’s first-tier big cities might look similar to big world cities. But social welfare still has a long way to match Japan, the U.S or European countries," said Industrial Bank’s Lu.

China’s growth has made it a major importer and consumer of oil and gas and the biggest source of greenhouse gases blamed for changing the climate.

Complaints that surging Chinese demand pushed up global crude prices have made energy a sensitive issue for Beijing. It angrily denied an International Energy Agency report last month that said it passed the United States in 2009 as the top energy consumer.

China’s 21st century rise marks a return to a status it held until the 18th century as Asia’s military, technological and cultural leader. That era ended as European colonial powers expanded and Chinese imperial leaders crushed reformers who wanted to imitate Japan’s embrace of Western technology.

China spent much of the 20th century wracked by war and political upheaval before reforms pioneered by leader Deng Xiaoping in 1979 opened the door to renewed growth.

China, with 10 times Japan’s population, has long been expected to catch up with its neighbor. But the global crisis and Japan’s sluggish growth brought that point forward by many years.

The International Monetary Fund is forecasting growth of up to 10.5 percent this year for China. By contrast, Monday’s data showed Japan grew at an annualized rate of just 0.4 percent in the latest quarter, well off the first quarter’s annualized 4.4 percent expansion.

The symbolism of dropping to third place might be the "wake-up call" Japanese leaders need to focus on reviving growth, said Martin Schulz, senior economist at Fujitsu Research Institute in Tokyo.

"Japan is always strangely inward-looking," he said. "And nobody is doing anything about it."

FROM WALLINGFORD – People had other things to do

August 15th, 2010

As Published in the Record Journal – Sunday August 15, 2010

Jason Zandri

100_1606_crop2

So the Primary race has ended. All the money that was spent by candidates seems to have been wasted on an electorate that basically had other things to do than show up and vote.

In Thursday’s Record Journal there was a cartoon depicting an excited TV viewer watching American Idol while clicking away on a phone (presumably to vote for a contestant). The next panel showed the same viewer snoozing in front of the television that was illustrating election information.

Unofficial voter statistics published showed that 2,969 voters came out and cast their vote for the office of Governor in Wallingford. That is the combined totals for the Republicans and the Democrats. The numbers were even lower for other races.

As of 2008, there were nearly 26,000 registered voters in Wallingford. If that number is still correct (or at least close) then the 2,969 voters represent an 11.4 percent turnout.

To be fair, a 26,000 registered voter total includes unaffiliated voters who cannot vote in the primary but despite that fact, the turnout is what I perceive to be unacceptably low for a free democracy. In other countries where the threat of physical harm up to and including death is often realized upon the electorate, the numbers of those that turn out are higher there than what we see here in America on a regular basis.

The primary on Tuesday was to select which people, from those that were nominated and from those that had enough support to force the primary, would be on the ballot for this upcoming November election.

Wallingford’s turnout was very low but they had plenty of company; most towns were in the same area percentagewise.

Secretary of the State Bysiewicz reported an average statewide turnout of about 20 percent around 5 pm on primary day as reported in the Hartford Courant.

Many will give myriad reasons why they “couldn’t” vote. Often it has to do with not having the spare time. These are the same people that leave the line in the coffee shop and head out to go wait an hour in line for fast food. They’ll complain about how bad the economy is too but you’ll see them daily in line buying food and coffee that could be prepared at home for much cheaper. But I digress.
Some will give you the argument of “there was no one running that I liked or cared for enough to be bothered to go.”

Who would you have then? Name me someone you think should have been running and then let’s you and me go and have a conversation with them and see if we can encourage them to run at some future date.

Someone has to run the town/state/country — if not these candidates then who?

If you are not going to help choose them by showing up to vote then the same minority of people that ARE turning out will keep putting THEIR favorites into office.

You don’t get to pick your boss (in most cases) and that person directly affects your ability to make a living. You can’t choose your family either (and that may be a plus or a minus).

What you do have the ability to do is vote your choices for who you want to govern you.

Why the majority chooses not to, year after year, election after election is a mystery to me.

I wonder: if the privilege to vote were to be forever revoked for three occurrences of non participation if it would change attitudes and the apparent lack of participation?

Unfortunately, you can’t claim to be a free society and attempt to compel citizens to vote.

Still, it’s a shame that the will of the electorate from the majority standpoint always seems to be one of non participation and no confidence.

If this were the attitude in 1776 we’d still be an English Colony today.

Bus Loop Maps and Arrival/Dismissal Procedures

August 12th, 2010

As published on the Wallingford Public Schools website

Bus routes will be in The Record Journal on Saturday, August 28, 2010.

Routes will also be available on our district web site.

Elementary school students attending either a K-2 or 3-5 partner school will have bus transportation available on an elective basis on August 30, 2010.  This is one day before school starts to make sure that your children are familiar with the bus stop time in the morning, the bus route and the school they will attend.  Children in grades K-2 and in grades 3-5 will be picked up at the same time.  Children will be able to participate in a dry run of the bus route they will take the first day of school. The bus will not let the children off the bus once they arrive at their school.  The bus will do the entire bus route and go to the school which will be followed by returning students to their bus stop simulating the return bus route.

Practice Bus Run on August 30, 2010

Bus Loop Maps and Arrival/Dismissal Procedures

Moses Y. Beach
Bus Loop
Arrival/Dismissal Procedure

Cook Hill
Bus Loop
Arrival/Dismissal Procedure

Highland
Bus Loop
Arrival/Dismissal Procedure

Parker Farms
Bus Loop
Arrival/Dismissal Procedure

Pond Hill
Bus Loop
Arrival/Dismissal Procedure

Rock Hill
Bus Loop
Arrival/Dismissal Procedure

Stevens
Bus Loop
Arrival/Dismissal Procedure

Yalesville
Bus Loop
Arrive/Dismissal Procedure
Daily Dismissal Procedure

DAG
Bus Loop
Arrival/Dismissal Procedure

Moran
Bus Loop
Arrival/Dismissal Procedure

Lyman Hall
Bus Loop & Arrival/Dismissal Procedure

Sheehan
Bus Loop & Arrival/Dismissal Procedure

FROM WALLINGFORD – Appreciate the normality

August 12th, 2010

As printed in the Record Journal Sunday August 8, 2010

This week’s FROM WALLINGFORD was written by my counterpart on the column – Stephen Knight

V-Knight_S

Municipal government in Wallingford CT is, on a day-to-day basis, a pretty routine and, well, unexciting enterprise. Politics can have its food-fight moments, but by and large there is a predictability about it all that we take for granted. But I would like to discuss a recent news event that graphically illustrates why we might come to really appreciate this normality.

I refer to Bell, California, a 2.64 square mile city of 38,000 near Los Angeles. Since July 15th, it has become the poster city for “government gone wild.” On this date, an investigative story was published by the Los Angeles Times bringing to light that: the annual salary paid to the City Manager was $787,000, to the Assistant City Manager was $376,000, and to the police chief was $457,000. As if that weren’t jaw-dropping enough, it was also revealed that four of the five City Councilors each hauled in $96,999 annually for their part-time positions. And as a final affront, it was noted that the City Manager and Police Chief would be receiving $600K and $450K pensions upon retirement.

As a student of government and former elected official, I am captivated by this story, much as others might watch a train wreck on YouTube. These guys didn’t embezzle the money or take bribes. They voted themselves this money. Now that this looting spree has come to light, the three administrative employees have resigned, the Council has voted to reduce their incomes by 90 percent, and the Attorney General of California has subpoenaed thousands of documents. The investigations are ongoing and the results will be very interesting.

So could this happen in our fair burg? I say confidently: absolutely not. Why? Reasons abound: the kind of people we attract to government service, the healthy two-party rivalry, strong freedom-of-information statutes and a local paper whose reporters actually attend all these public meetings. But above all, this public pillaging will not occur in Wallingford for two reasons: we have a carefully-written and scrupulously followed Town Charter and hundreds if not thousands of residents in this town take an interest in their local government.

Town Charter: The political and administrative structure outlined in this document is designed for and results in real government transparency. And its tenets are rigorously adhered to. There are strict timelines for the presentation of an annual budget, published copies of the Mayor’s proposed budget in mind-numbing detail, public hearings to solicit input from residents, and open meetings where every line item of the budget is scrutinized. Important boards and commissions are made up of members of the public whose meetings are held in open forum. The public does have the power of initiative and referendum. It has an entire chapter entitled Ethics and Conflict of Interest. It is fifty pages of codified, common sense, open government practices.

Public interest in government: While a carefully written foundational government document is a critical element in successful self-government, far and away the most important element is an electorate that informs itself, knows its local officials, and participates in the public conversation. It encourages in government an unspoken standard of professionalism, competence and, frankly, pride that makes all the difference. A culture of real public service results from the public actually demanding good service and participating in boards and commissions to make that happen. Where the public is uninvolved or indifferent, the result is a government that separates itself from the people they are supposed to serve and a culture of entitlement and self-dealing. Here in Wallingford, hundreds of us serve on boards, commissions and committees doing our part to preserve the special sense of community we have.

The real lesson of the Bell CA scandal is that, alas, it is true that we do ultimately get the government we ask for. Or, better stated, the government we get is in direct proportion to the effort we put into its creation and maintenance.

For bicycle-rack proponent, it’s a two-wheel world

August 11th, 2010

As published in the Record Journal Wednesday August 11, 2010

By Jesse Buchanan
Record-Journal staff
jbuchanan@record-journal.com 
(203) 317-2230

Follow all the news directly on the Record Journal Website for the most up to date information. www.myrecordjournal.com

Write a letter to the editor letters@record-journal.com

WALLINGFORD — In a bright yellow shirt, or a ski suit in cold weather, Ben Martin stands out on his ride to work. Since moving to town in 1998, Martin has been bicycling to and from work most days, including in the winter. For him, there’s no contest between taking a bike and taking a car — biking is healthier, saves money and is better for the environment.

“It was gradual thing,” he said Tuesday. “I kind of got addicted to it. … Now it’s year-round that I ride.” Martin, who is trying to spread his enthusiasm for biking by collecting petition signatures asking local officials to put bike racks in the town center, has a 4.25-mile commute from Ward Street to Fiserv Financial Services Technology Solutions on Sterling Drive.

It usually takes him 15 to 20 minutes, but that’s nothing for Martin, 36, who earlier this year participated in a 135-mile ride across the state.

He said he finds biking to work less stressful than negotiating traffic in his car, and he gets to see his neighborhood in a different way on two wheels. He showers and changes at his workplace, and takes a change of clothes in a waterproof bag on rainy days. Martin said he doesn’t enjoy the winter cold, but by bundling up he stays warm.

The yellow clothing, Martin said, helps make him visible to drivers, who, he added, generally respect his presence on the road.

“I’ll be to the right of the road so people can get by, but I’m not going to ride on the sidewalk or the grass,” he said. Police Officer Linda Lopresto said town ordinances require bicyclists to ride on the road and not on the sidewalk.

“They’re supposed to follow all the rules of the road,” she said Tuesday.

Martin has had some close calls — a car once pulled in front of him and stopped suddenly — but he’s never been in an accident, he said.

In addition to commuting, Martin takes his bike on shopping trips and got a wheeled child carrier for added carrying capacity. On one occasion, Martin said he has carried a guitar, amplifier, food, clothes and a laptop while biking with the carrier.

A self-described environmentalist, he finds biking preferable to driving.

“It’s a better way to get around as far as your carbon footprint,” he said. “You’re not giving more money to people who are spilling oil in the Gulf.”

Cheshire resident Eric Nelson doesn’t own a car and also bikes to work and stores. Choosing a bike over a car was a financial decision, he said, and the 10-minute commute to his job at Town Hall wouldn’t be much faster in a car.

“It saves a lot of money. It’s economic,” he said. “It costs an arm and a leg to own a car.”

After raising the idea of installing bike racks in downtown Wallingford at Town Council meetings, Martin hopes to collect 500 to 1,000 signatures on his petition. The rack plan has yet to gain traction with town officials.

He’s also suggested the town give bikes to police rather than cruisers for some duties, such as directing traffic close to the station.

Martin suggests that people start biking short distances, such as a trip alone to a store to buy a few things. People who commute a long distance can also park their cars in a commuter lot halfway and bike the remaining distance. Martin said he has started biking longer and longer distances and using his car less and less. “You get hooked on it,” he said.

Today is Primary Day – Polls are open until 8PM

August 10th, 2010

Make sure you take the time to get out there and cast your votes for who you want on the ballot come election day in November

Wallingford Democrat Ballot as provided in the Record Journal

image

Wallingford Republican Ballot as provided in the Record Journal

image

Activist’s workshop aims to inspire Hispanic youth

August 7th, 2010

As Published in the Record Journal Saturday August 7, 2010

By Samaia Hernandez
Record-Journal staff
shernandez@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2266

Follow all the news directly on the Record Journal Website for the most up to date information. www.myrecordjournal.com

Write a letter to the editor letters@record-journal.com

Jason SCOW America shirt

WALLINGFORD — His activism helped save the town’s annual fireworks celebration at the 11th hour, but can Jason Zandri inspire civic participation in Hispanic youth?

He gave it a try Friday at the Spanish Community of Wallingford, discussing topics such as voter turnout and grass-roots activism, like the kind that occurred during the debate over the town-owned Wooding-Caplan parcel.

Nearly 40 middle and high school students attended the lecture Friday as part of the Adelante America leadership program, which sponsors weekly educational lectures and activities for Hispanic youth in Wallingford. The program is sponsored by a grant from AT&T’s educational initiative and is administered through the League of United Latin American Citizens. It aims to help lower the high school dropout rate among Latino youth by exposing students to post secondary ideas and concepts.

The program, hosted by SCOW, is set to end in August. Maria F. Harlow, the agency’s director, is hoping to gain funding for next year to keep it going yearlong.

“It’s supposed to be for the kids that are at risk,” Harlow said, “But we have many kids who are motivated already. … We’re looking for role models to bring here to talk to them and inspire them about what to do with their lives.”

Zandri’s visit is also a way of leading by example.

He gave a presentation on technology to the group last month, but was originally connected with the agency after hearing about its renovation under Harlow, who took over this year after serving as chairwoman of the board.

“He sent an e-mail and said, ‘How can I help?’ ” Harlow said.

Zandri, a senior technology account manager for Microsoft, put his expertise to work and upgraded all 12 computers at the center. He also unlocked a blocked computer and fixed a wireless router thought to be permanently broken.

“Now people can come to the center. If they have their own computer, they can connect on a laptop,” Zandri said.

Friday, however, was focused on community involvement, one of Zandri’s passions outside of work. “I take issue with a lack of civic involvement,” he said. Valencia Mendoza, 16, a Wallingford resident and Wilcox Technical High School junior, said this summer’s program is much more entertaining that last year’s, which was halted halfway into the summer due to lack of participation.

“This year is better. We’ve been going on field trips a lot,” Mendoza said. Meeting people in the community including engineers and members of the armed services has piqued her interest the most.

“Now I know that there’s so much more out there,” she said.

Mexican guest workers, laid off, want BP’s help

August 6th, 2010

Seriously? With total nonfarm unemployment rate at 9.5 percent according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (and that is the number of people laid off and receiving benefits – the U3 number, he U6 number of all those unemployed is higher at 16.5 percent) why do we have ANY guest workers?

Honor the existing H-2B visas AND DO NOT GRANT ANYMORE. At the very least not until unemployment goes down to below 5%.

Here is the link to the United States Department of Labor Statistics alternative measures of labor underutilization that shows the U3 unemployment number (the one most cited in the news) and the U6 number of all the unemployed.

It is slightly improved but still pretty bad.

Here is the New York Times News Service story -  Mexican guest workers, laid off, want BP’s help

NEW ORLEANS — Soon after the oil from the Deepwater Horizon began gushing into the Gulf of Mexico, business at the Ramada Plaza Beach Resort in Fort Walton Beach, Fla., dried up — and so did the jobs of five Mexican housekeepers who were guest workers at the hotel under contracts guaranteeing them work until Nov. 1.

“On June 30, they told us our jobs were over, and that we had to leave our housing and go back to Mexico,” Salvador Luna Espinoza, one of the housekeepers, said in a telephone interview conducted with a translator. “I’m staying with friends now, but I don’t know how long they’ll put up with me.”

While thousands have lost their jobs as a result of the oil spill, the layoffs present special hardships for guest workers, mostly hotel workers and those working in shellfish processing.

Under their H-2B visas, they are allowed to work only for the employer who arranged their visa, and they must leave the United States within 10 days of losing their job.

Most took on debt of $1,000 or more to pay for the trip to the United States, planning to pay it back with their earnings.

Mr. Luna Espinoza, who has a wife and five children at home in El Tizate, Mexico, said that without the $7.75-an-hour hotel job, he had no hope of repaying his debt — and unless he could do so, no one would back him in arranging another visa or another job.

So he is still in the United States, awaiting compensation.

“What they face is basically a guillotine the moment they’re laid off,” said Saket Soni, executive director of the Alliance of Guestworkers for Dignity, a grass-roots New Orleans organization that is helping the laid-off housekeepers, and other guest workers laid off from a Baton Rouge seafood processor, file claims with BP. “We would like to see them treated not as disposable workers, but as people who deserve relief in a disaster.”

In theory, guest workers have the same rights to compensation from BP as anyone else who lost income due to the oil spill. But as a practical matter, getting that compensation is far more difficult for workers from another county, who speak little English and may not understand the claims process or have the documentation from employers to file a claim.

With the help of Mr. Soni’s alliance, Mr. Luna Espinoza filed a BP claim for lost wages of $5,498.63, backed up by a letter from Ramada saying that his layoff was due to the oil spill. He has not yet received compensation, though. On July 9, the alliance filed a petition with the Labor Department, asking that it issue a formal policy directing those in the spill zone who employ guest workers to pay all the wages due under the contract, as well as the guest workers’ fare home.

“It shouldn’t be on the guest workers’ shoulders to bear the costs of the spill,” Mr. Soni said. “The employers are in a much better position to get BP to reimburse them.”

Indeed, guest workers are in a tenuous position, usually living in labor camps or other housing run by their employers, with little connection to the surrounding community, and little understanding of their legal rights. Many fear retaliation from employers or immigration authorities if they make complaints. And when their jobs end suddenly, many have no idea where to turn, and, like Mr. Luna Espinoza, drift off to stay with someone from their home country.

The alliance petition said many guest workers would no longer be in the United States when any compensation was issued. If BP does issue Mr. Luna Espinoza a check, it will be sent to the alliance, since he has no fixed address.

At the Labor Department, a spokeswoman for Nancy Leppink, deputy administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, would say only that the division would “respond appropriately” to the alliance’s petition.

At the Ramada, business is still depressed, said Joseph Guidry, the general manager. Mr. Guidry declined to comment on the petition or the issue of requiring employers to pay out the contract and then await reimbursement from BP.

Mr. Luna Espinoza said he had been a guest worker before, working on a tobacco farm in Virginia. So which did he prefer?

“It was much better in tobacco,” he said. “They had more hours of work for me.”