STEVE KNIGHT
Stephen Knight is a former Wallingford Town Councilor.
As published in the Record Journal Sunday August 9, 2009
The purchase of open space by government has a profound and lasting benefit to the entire community. It is a gift one generation of taxpayers bequeaths to those that follow it long after. When one generation makes a financial sacrifice that can only benefit people they will never know, that community has every reason to be proud of that effort. If there is any altruism left in politics, this is where it shows up.
Last week we learned of the State of Connecticut’s intent to purchase the development rights to some of the Cella property on the east side. While it appears that the town government is not involved in this transaction, the impetus for the purchase had to come from somewhere. Whoever was involved should be applauded.
Then there is the Choate proposal, where the school has offered to commit a significant percentage of its acreage to permanent open space status in return for the closing of a portion of Old Durham Road, as well as to turn over the boathouse property to the town, property that can then be returned to open space. Little to be lost in the short term; much to be gained in the long term.
Over the past fifty years, Wallingford has transitioned from a mill/farm town into a suburban community. The “industrial spine” parallel to Route 5 still exists to some extent, and the town has augmented its acreage devoted to such use with industrial parks sitting on land which was at one time in agricultural use. At the same time, many of the farms which made up most of the east and west sides of the town have disappeared both because of the unfavorable economics of the business and the very favorable economics of rising land prices resulting from the suburbanization.
The municipal government cannot and should not halt this transition entirely, but if we are serious about wanting to maintain the “small town feel” that most of us find one of the most appealing aspects of living here, we must seize what opportunities that come our way to add to our open space inventory. Here’s why: When it’s gone, it’s gone: You cannot postpone open space purchases. The opportunities arise and the choice is made: the property either gets developed or not. If the town does not act, the owner will, very legitimately, make other use of the property, most likely by building single family homes. Once those homes are in place, that is the use to which the property will be put for generations.
We’re expensive: While it grates on some people to hear this, single family housing results in a significant commitment of resources for the town government in public education, police and fire protection, recreation, et cetera — more resources than can possibly be derived from taxing these homes. Open space helps balance the demands we have for services with the town’s financial ability to provide them because this land requires little in the way of town services.
We have responsibilities: Our forebears had the foresight to create parks and playgrounds throughout our community, and those purchases they made are in part responsible for the ambiance we all enjoy as residents. Thus we have a heritage of foresight to carry forward to those in future generations fortunate to live here.
Our Electric Division was created just over 100 years ago, and the foresight employed by the municipal leaders of that time has been loudly praised to the present day. It took political courage and a sizeable financial commitment of town resources to have done what they did back then, and the benefits derived are probably beyond their wildest dreams. Well, over 900 acres of open space has been purchased in the past fifteen years, and it required the same mindset to see the long term benefits of those acquisitions. Do we still possess that same prescience?
I say yes.
Tags: From Wallingford, Open Space, Opinion