Archive for the ‘Opinion’ Category

With thoughts to the victims, their families, and the citizens of Aurora, Colorado

Monday, July 23rd, 2012

I have read many of the news stories regarding the situation out in Aurora, Colorado with respect to the diabolic actions of James Eagan Holmes while I have been away on vacation.

My thoughts go out to all the victims, their families, and the citizens of Aurora that have been impacted by this senseless tragedy.

This is my one and only blog post about it; it will be pulled to my Facebook page and my Twitter account and then I am not going to comment further on my own post or on other postings.

There is nothing I can really say, other than “you are in my thoughts and the thoughts of my family” that is going to lessen the impact on those directly affected and to continually post and comment on it may be exactly part of what the offending scumbag wanted – more attention and limelight – which I am not going to give him.

It is a shame the courts simply do not do summary judgments and executions in cut and dried situations like this. If they did perhaps, perhaps, it might stem one or two of these events and they might not occur because a few of the potential perpetrators wouldn’t get the end result of attention they were looking for and might decide against that action. (Yes, wishful thinking – I know).

I was never for or against gun control.  I figured above and beyond the constitutional rights of it all, the “legal” gun owners were mostly responsible and this was an area where Government would be best served just staying out of it. Let the gun owners have their right to their guns and be “policed” under existing laws (which I felt were enough).

In the wake of this tragedy I find myself wishing that one or two of the friends I have that are gun owners were in the theater for that midnight show. One old friend I believe would have done his best to ensure the safety of his family first (had he been in there with them) and most likely would have tried to stop the carnage if he could after. It would not have been a shot to the knee either even if it was a clearer shot.

People were going to die that night – that was this scumbag’s plan all along. Perhaps, just perhaps, if someone with a concealed carry permit was in the theater and carrying, a few more might have made it out.

I will say one final thing to all that are reading this, here and abroad, don’t let events like this stop you from going outside, mixing in large social environments or tourist areas, enjoying life, and meeting new people. This was totally random and senseless; it could happen in your hometown grocery store or somewhere you’re visiting as you go about your work or vacation travels. The end result is simple, random, chance unfortunately.

If you change the way you live your life wholesale because of situations like this the scumbags win.

Myself and my family, we will not let them win – not in this way. Ever.

Zandri-ism – Convenience Conundrum

Thursday, June 7th, 2012

It is disconcerting when something done for the sake of convenience suddenly becomes inconvenient

FROM WALLINGFORD – What Memorial Day means

Sunday, May 27th, 2012

This op-ed piece was written by Stephen Knight and published in the Record Journal on Sunday May 27, 2012

Tomorrow is Memorial Day, one of the most important days on the American calendar, because it is a day we set aside to honor those who have paid the ultimate price so that we may be free. Most often, this column covers local Wallingford political events, but those matters fade into utter triviality when one considers the significance of this holiday, and so that will be my topic, admittedly borrowing heavily from previous “From Wallingford” submissions on this subject.

I will start by making the observation that, over the years, while the day has lost some of its solemnity, Memorial Day has somewhat evolved into a second Veterans Day, where we not only honor those no longer with us, but also extend gratitude to those who are. Given that, with every passing day, there are so many that have served who are reaching the end of their time on earth, and given that our country is at war, with so many past and present members of the military having been placed in harm’s way, many never to return alive, it is entirely appropriate that we do so.

So, tomorrow, we honor those citizens among us who have answered the call and continue to answer the call to serve in the armed forces of the United States. From Valley Forge to Lake Champlain to Gettysburg to Verdun to Normandy to the Chosin Reservoir to Hue to Kuwait to Baghdad to Kandahar and countless other places in the world, the American soldier has stood and defended this country with honor and distinction, first with the ferocity and determination to win the battle, and then the kindness and compassion to win the hearts and minds of those they have liberated. They have always conducted themselves under the rules of international law and those of common humanity, and have been quick to condemn those incredibly few within their ranks who would stain that record of honor. And in their service, the American veteran — whether protecting the freedom of hundreds of millions of human beings in peacetime or liberating many hundreds of millions from tyranny and enslavement in wartime — has been a positive force throughout the world and has brought credit to this country. However, there is one special trait that, in my mind, makes the American soldier, sailor or airman an almost-unique figure in the history of conflict. Consider that, in almost every armed conflict you can name, one side was pursuing conquest and the other side was defending itself from that subjugation or annihilation. The defenders had a personal stake in the outcome, that oftentimes being survival itself.

But if you examine the history of the wars in which America has been involved, especially those in the 20th and 21st century, you see our involvement not only to protect the security and interests of the United States but, in a larger sense, to defend the concept that liberty and freedom are a basic right of all of humanity. To have risked their lives in defense of this high ideal and not just the protection of their homeland puts US military men and women in a category unique to human history.

He may no longer be president of France, but Nicholas Sarkozy, speaking to the US Congress, described this concept beautifully: “America did not teach men the idea of freedom; she taught them how to practice it. And she fought for this freedom whenever she felt it to be threatened somewhere in the world. It was by watching America grow that men and women understood that freedom was possible.

‘What made America great was her ability to transform her own dream into hope for all mankind.

‘The men and women of my generation heard their grandparents talk about how in 1917, America saved France at a time when it had reached the final limits of its strengths, which it had exhausted in the most absurd and bloodiest of wars.

‘The men and women of my generation heard their parents talk about how in 1944, America returned to free Europe from the horrifying tyranny that threatened to enslave it.

‘Fathers took their sons to see the vast cemeteries where, under thousands of white crosses so far from home, thousands of young Americans lay who had fallen not to defend their own freedom but the freedom of all others, not to defend their own families, their own homeland, but to defend humanity as a whole.” To view photographs of the Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial in France where 9,387 US servicemen are buried renders one speechless at the contemplation of such heroism. It is an honor to call them, and all who have put on the US military uniform, our fellow citizens.

An old “FROM WALLINGFORD” article of mine from May of 2009

Saturday, December 17th, 2011

I was backing up some files on my PC this morning and archiving them off the hard drive when I came across this old “FROM WALLINGFORD” article. It was the second one I wrote for the Record Journal back in May of 2009.

 

I finished reading a bedtime story to my two older kids, Andrew who will be five in August and Angela who turned three this past January. I try my best to read to them every night that I am home at a sensible hour, which fortunately is most nights. As part of the routine, I lay down with them for a few minutes each before I leave their rooms. The whole event barely takes an hour of time and that will often include playing on the living room floor for a couple of minutes with my youngest son Adam who turns one on the 17th of May.

Generally by 8PM I am headed back down to my home office to finish up whatever work I need to get done that had gotten away from me during the course of my workday. I say generally because Andrew will often protest a little bit because he would like me to stay until he falls asleep and today was no exception.  I said to him “tonight I really can’t; I have a lot of things I need to try to finish up before I go to bed.”

“Oh, OK Daddy, you can go then.” I kissed him on the forehead and got up. He called out “Dobranoc” (“good night” in Polish) as I left the room.

Tonight, part of that work that needed finishing happened to be my submission for this week’s edition of From Wallingford. I’m supposed to get this in before the end of the day on Wednesday. My previous submission (which was my first) was sent via email at the actual end of the day – midnight. I was happy this time that despite getting slammed at work that I was just doing a final proof read at 8PM and that I was going to have four hours to spare.

I was closing up browser windows on my computer before opening Outlook up when I realized that I still had the “Lyman Hall friends mourn Brian McCarthy” story open from the morning; I had gotten so busy at 6AM with work emails that came in that I stopped reading the paper online and only upon seeing the story again had I realized that interruption had occurred fourteen hours before.

I minimized the submission I was working on and started to read the story.

Brian McCarthy died on Monday due to injuries sustained from a single car accident on Whirlwind Hill Road which occurred on Thursday. There were two other teenagers in the car that had sustained injuries from the crash but the story outlined that they were both expected to fully recover.

I didn’t personally know Brian McCarthy. As I read the story that kept coming up in my mind for some reason. I did know from the article that he was somebody’s brother and somebody’s son. He was a “friend, classmate and teammate” to many. The story finished “Brian was such a great kid” “we are all going to miss him.”

I took a look at the submission I was about to send in for my article this week and decided to save it for another day.

I turned off my monitors and the lights in my office and headed upstairs.

My wife called out to me “did you finish the article?”

“No” I said, “I need to re-write the whole thing.”

I peaked in Angela’s room; she was fast asleep.

I went into Andrew’s room and as carefully as I could I laid myself down next to him.

He opened his eyes just slightly and said “are you done working Daddy”?

“No, but I’d rather stay here right now. I have until midnight.”

Tomorrow, Tuesday November 8, 2011 is Election Day

Monday, November 7th, 2011

It’s not often that you get your chance to have your say, really have the opportunity to voice your mind and thoughts.

You do get an optimum chance on Election Day more so than any other time of the year.

There is no body of government that can affect you as much and that you have as much effect on as your municipal government.

Your municipal leaders regulate your ordinances, set the local budget for the town and the schools, as well as maintain and manage the tax base of the town.

If you voted in the federal election in 2008 you were one voice in 169 million registered. (About 133 million showed up to cast a vote).

86 million democrat – 55 million republican – 28 million others registered.

Of those voters there were 132,645,504 total voters out of an eligible voting age population of 212,702,354, which gives you a 62.4% participation rate.

For the elections held at the state level here in Connecticut as of 2010 the total number of registered voters is a hair over 2 million.

The largest group of registered voters in Connecticut is unaffiliated, accounting for 831,962 voters. There are 743,580 registered Democrats and 413,854 registered Republicans.

So when 73 percent of the state voters turnout, your voice is one in 1.46 million.

You as the voter in Wallingford during a municipal election are one of about 25,000 registered. During our last municipal election only 35.6 percent of the registered voters turned out.

Your voice there is one of about 8,900.

Where do you think your voice is the loudest?

Where do you think your voice is best heard among all the noise?

Wallingford is your town – get informed, get involved and VOTE on Tuesday November 8th

Remembering 9/11, 2001

Sunday, September 11th, 2011

Today is the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. I am going to stay offline from 8:46AM until 10:28AM (from the time the first plane hit until the last building dropped)…. No Facebook posts, no blog posts, no chat and so forth. I am turning the TV off and I am going to spend the time doing some quiet reflecting.

Police officers, fire fighters, emergency medical technicians, members of the armed forces – people that put on their uniforms, kiss their spouse, pat their kids on the head and then head out the door to serve their community and who put themselves into harm’s way to project our freedom and way of life.

Heroes all.

911lights

firefighters1024_768

My thought for today after attending a wake

Thursday, September 8th, 2011

This evening ( Thursday September 8 ) I stopped by to pay my last respects to Philip A. Wright, Sr. who passed on September 4th.

In the receiving line there was a table next to where the condolence cards were being kept. On this table was a small plaque that read:

“Life is not a journey to the grave with intentions of arriving safely in a pretty well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out and loudly proclaiming … WOW! What a ride!”


Yeah Mr. Wright, that is EXACTLY how I am going to remember you.

Hopefully someone will come along to pick up in place of you but you’ll never be fully replaced.

Rest in peace sir.

RECORD JOURNAL FORUMS – Aug. 11, 2011: Residents petition parking lot agreement

Monday, August 15th, 2011

There is a thread over on the Forums pages of the Record Journal website titled Aug. 11, 2011: Residents petition parking lot agreement where there is some very sharp but engaged opinion and viewpoint on the current subject and I recommend people take a look at the thoughts that are being expressed there. (In case people are unfamiliar with my screen name I am GUNDERSTONE on the board.)

The news story itself can be found via Wallingford residents petition parking lot agreement

I have stated my thoughts on this; I still do not believe it is in the best interest for the town to leverage $500,000.00 in tax money to improve private property for the use of municipal parking.

We have had an agreement in place for years there that never involved a major investment like this and I believe we could come to a new agreement along similar terms – I don’t believe the deal needs to be sweetened.

If we are interested in using $500,000.00 in tax money to further augment and improve available municipal parking downtown we have the entire Wooding-Caplan lot that could use some serious maintenance and upkeep. Investing the money there, on our own property, would go a long way towards making sure there are more available spaces to use for patrons of the businesses there.

I am open to a better argument as to why using the money on the private parking area behind Simpson Court makes sense and has benefits down the road but I haven’t heard it.

Simpson Court parking deal and why it really isn’t a deal

Friday, August 12th, 2011

Recently the Town Council approved an agreement with four private property owners giving the town the authority to make improvements worth $500,000 to the rear parking lots behind Simpson Court businesses. The agreement also requires the town to provide maintenance for 30 years at taxpayer cost.

There have been two articles in the Record Journal about it recently:

Some object to Simpson parking deal – Petition campaign seeks to force referendum

Nothing new about parking plan – Simpson scheme has been around more than decade

If we really wanted to do this we should have executed on it ten years ago when times were better and the project cost half as much. In true Wallingford fashion we waited and we’re trying to do it now when it costs much more.

In either situation I wouldn’t agree this is the best use for this money.

The Mayor is fond of saying when it comes to ball fields for Little League that if we build it for them, other sports teams would want facilities of their own too.

This has been one of his key points to the argument all these years which is one of the reasons why to this day there still is no single facility.

So if we spend tax dollars that benefit (even if it is a shared benefit) private property owners, wouldn’t we expect other private property owners to want the same benefits in the future?

I patronize many of the businesses in the Simpson Court area and this is nothing against them at all; I simply feel that it is a mistake to commit taxpayer dollars in this fashion.

We already consume tax dollars annually with the small degree of maintenance and support to the parking area already. This comes in the form of snow plowing in the winter and so on. This is in exchange for the use of the area for the businesses as well as “municipal parking.”

Obviously, people that patronize the businesses will use the rear parking – that would be expected. The agreement for the “municipal parking” use comes into play, as an example, when people park their cars there and go to the Twilight Tunes on the Parade Ground.

So in that effect the give and take is arguable, it’s been something we’ve been doing for a long time and as long as the overall and ongoing maintenance and support to the parking area stays manageable I don’t see any reason why the mutually beneficial agreement couldn’t continue.

I can’t support the use of funds to upgrade / improve their property however. At a bare minimum, after the improvements are made it could potentially make the respective properties more valuable. That’s great for the tax base I suppose but if the property owner, for example, sold the property and profiteered additionally as a direct result of tax dollars being used to upgrade and improve their parking area I don’t think I would be happy with that even knowing that the town still gets to use the area for parking out of the new owners. 

If $500,000.00 is available to address parking downtown then we should commit that to the Wooding-Caplan property. The town already owns that and it would be spending the dollars on the upgrading / upkeep of its own property rather than the private property of four business owners.

I support the petition that is being circulated which is calling for a public referendum on the item. If enough signatures are collected then it would go on the ballot for people to vote on. Additionally, it would be wise to put it on the general ballot in November as it would make it so there is no additional cost to the town anyway since there is a general election taking place.

At referendum, if the majority of the voters approve the measure to spend the money on the private property of four business owners, then the council would be realized to have made the correct vote on behalf of the citizens in the first place with respect to the project. Nothing will change and the effort can go forward – case closed.

If the citizens vote it down then they will have NOT agreed with the council’s vote and they will have had their say. The project will not occur and something else will have to be voted upon.

Democracy in action.

You’ve heard my thoughts on this – take some time to read through the articles in the newspaper and get the information for yourself.

Consider signing the petition which only sets up the referendum and allows it to happen.

Then, make your choice – yes or no – do we, as a town, want to spend $500,000 in this manner.

It’s your town – get informed and get involved.

Lemonade? Don’t try it!

Friday, August 12th, 2011

This op-ed piece was written by Rich Lowry who is the editor of The National Review. It was published in the Record Journal on Sunday August 7, 2011

There’s no more poignant symbol of American childhood than the lemonade stand, evocative of long, lazy summer days and pie-in-the-sky entrepreneurial dreams.

It inevitably was a subject for a Norman Rockwell print, with a brassy kid confidently hawking cups for 5 cents each. If Rockwell were to update the image today, he might have to include an officer of the law nosing around the stand to ensure its compliance with all relevant ordinances.

In various localities around the country this summer, cops have raided and shut down lemonade stands. The incidents get — and deserve — national attention as telling collisions between classic Americana and the senseless pettifogging that is increasingly the American Way.

There should be an easy rule of thumb for when enforcement of a regulation has gone too far: When it makes kids cry.

Setting up a lemonade stand has always been the occasion for early lessons about the importance of hustle and perseverance, and some business basics — like location, location, location. It shouldn’t be the occasion for dealing with the unreasoning dictates of The Man.

Police in Coralville, Iowa, a few weeks ago conducted a sweep and shut down three lemonade stands, some within minutes of their opening. The offenders had started their renegade operations the weekend of an annual bike ride across the state. The town requires vendors to have a permit during the days of the event. None of the perps did, including one 4-year-old girl who shamelessly made $4 before police intervened.

One mother said she could only laugh when the police told her the cost of a permit was $400. Uncomprehending, her kids cried. They figured only the inadequacy of their handmade signs could have made the city’s law enforcement want to put them out of business.

A Coralville civic eminence subsequently explained that the ordinance was in place to protect the health of the bike riders, who are apparently robust enough to bike 472 miles but might be felled by 6 ounces of lemonade.

In McAllen, Texas, two kids were shut down and their grandmother threatened with a fine on similar grounds. Audaciously, the youngsters started selling lemonade for 50 cents a cup in a park without a health permit or licensed food handlers to prepare or serve their lemony libation. Hoping only to fund the upkeep of their two hermit crabs, these two children had stumbled into a murky world way over their heads.

In Midway, Ga., three girls were told they needed a business license, peddler’s permit and food permit to set up a lemonade stand on their front lawn. It might have taken all summer just to navigate the bureaucracy necessary to begin selling the lemonade. The chief of police explained why she had to act to protect the public from the unauthorized sale of the unknown substance purporting to be “lemonade”: “We were not aware of how the lemonade was made, who made the lemonade, of what the lemonade was made with.”

Chances are that it was made of the usual dangerous cocktail of lemon juice, sugar and water. If children — or their parents — aren’t to be trusted to prepare lemonade, presumably people lured by the prospect of a cool drink on a hot day can calculate the risks on their own and take their pocket change elsewhere if they feel safe only with professional-quality product. Invariably, the parents of illicit lemonade stand vendors protest to the authorities, “but they’re just kids.” That should be a clinching, self-evident argument. But not when an unbending legalism is ascendant, and there’s a law for everything. It’s in this spirit that we pat down children in the security lines of airports.

People in authority are afraid ever to be caught rendering common-sense judgments.

For now, the lemonade-stand crackdowns are a bridge too far. They usually bring cries of public outrage and embarrassed backpedaling from officials. So belly up to the lemonade stand — while you still can.